CONCLUDING UNSCIENTIFIC POSTSCRIPT PHILOSOPHICAL FRAGMENTS PDF
Concluding Unscientific Postscript to Philosophical Fragments, Volume 1 has ratings and 14 reviews. John said: In many ways, this book is necessary w. This chapter offers a reading of Søren Kierkegaard’s philosophical work Concluding Unscientific Postscript to ‘Philosophical Fragments’ to illuminate his ideas. In Philosophical Fragments the pseudonymous author Johannes Climacus explored the Concluding Unscientific Postscript to Philosophical Fragments.
|Published (Last):||8 November 2012|
|PDF File Size:||12.18 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||13.76 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
How can we tell, the Postscript asks, when a prayer to God is authentic? Thomas Ryan rated it it was amazing May 21, Hannay’s translation is the first to retain this crucial nuance.
This concerns the character of genuine prayer. It is not composed of propositions or perceptions of the external world, but of introspection, experiences, and especially one’s relationship with God. Through the discipline of resignation, aiming at an absolute commitment to the highest good, through the discipline of suffering, through the consciousness of guilt, the way leads step by step to a more profound pathos, until by a leap we reach the absolute maximum of subjectivity in the Christian consciousness of sin, with its imperative need for a new departure.
The Postscript ‘s uncomfortable solution is to try to wave at what it cannot touch. The first total opponent of Hegel’s standpoint was Soren Kierkegaard, father of modern existentialism. Kierkegaard left the task of discovering jnscientific meaning of his works to the reader, because “the task must be made difficult, for only the difficult inspires the noble-hearted”. Do those things make one a Christian? Its fruit is Kierkegaard’s Writingsthe comprehensively annotated Princeton edition of Kierkegaard’s complete works.
This article about a book on metaphysics pbilosophical a stub. Views Read Edit View history. Feb 15, David Tye rated it it was amazing. Print Save Cite Email Share. An objectivist understanding of truth expresses itself, therefore, not merely in terms of practical materialism, but also in a general quantification of all life, as it may be seen in the craving for records in sport, in pride in the growth of cities of millions of inhabitants, in respect for the multi-millionaire, in admiration for great political power.
Anything by Kierkegaard provokes a frank, Christian self-examination. This is like listening to the smartest person you’ve ever met thinking out loud about Hegel and Christianity for 12 hours straight.
Concluding Unscientific Postscript to Philosophical Fragments – Oxford Scholarship
Scholars have interpreted Kierkegaard variously as an existentialist, neo-orthodoxist, postmodernist, humanist, and individualist. Most philosophers are bad writers. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Just a moment while we sign you in to your Goodreads account.
No, I had another interpretation of it. By contrast, the passionless Christian is so far from fulfilling the task of praying to God that he may be regarded as having utterly flouted it namely, as though he were an enthusiast of idolatryeven if he has gotten his prayer’s objective dimension right.
In many ways, this book is necessary while also being provocative. I have often taken exception to anyone who was a sinner in the strictest sense and then promptly got busy terrifying others. It was as alien as it could possibly be to my nature to want to terrify others, and therefore I both sadly and perhaps also a bit proudly found my joy in comforting others and in being gentleness itself to them-hiding the terror in my own interior being.
Concluding Unscientific Postscript to Philosophical Fragments – Wikiquote
Oxford UP,pp. There are no discussion topics on this book yet. This fact can be a convenience, but it can also be a curse; in borderline cases, it tempts the translator to sacrifice English clarity for sharper surface echoes of the Danish. Don’t have an account? So I will focus on the Postscript ‘s best-known and most incendiary sentence.
Concluding Unscientific Postscript to Philosophical Fragments, Volume 1
Yet the Postscript also insists echoing the project of Philosophical Crumbs the book to which it is a postscript that the true Christian’s task differs from, and indeed is far harder than, Socrates’ examined life. Howard Vincent Hong Editor.
Users without a subscription are not able to see the full content.
For these reasons, Hannay’s Postscript is not merely the book’s best English translation yet; it is also the most inviting and accessible. And that encounter between system and anti-system is very relevant to any examination of philosophical theology to-day.