ELOGIO DE LA IRRELIGION PDF
Buy Elogio de la Irreligion by John Allen Paulos (ISBN: ) from Amazon’s Book Store. Everyday low prices and free delivery on eligible orders. Elogio de la Irreligion by John Allen Paulos, , TusQuets edition. Elogio de la irreligion/ Irreligion: Un Matematico explica por que los argumentos a favor de la existencia de Dios, sencillamente, no se sostienenA Why the.
|Published (Last):||13 October 2004|
|PDF File Size:||10.66 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||12.44 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Not that any atheist would agree with me: Or how Christianity has played out over the last 20 centuries. Wait till your eight year old daughter turns sixteen: Oh, i’m sure atheists claim to be an expert in this area, but any quick conversation usually just shows their frustration with anything that calls sin what it actually is. God does not compute He’s a numbe God does not compute An Existential Detective Story.
Oct 22, Ciaran rated it liked it. Mar 17, Iris rated it did not like it.
Irreligion: A Mathematician Explains Why the Arguments for God Just Don’t Add Up
Most of the refutations aren’t original, but Paulos doesn’t claim they are – he just thinks it’d be useful to irreligon them all in one place. A good read that is more approachable than you would expect. Nothing new here for people already decently well-read in the genre.
But that’s mostly theologically incorrect. Hardcoverpages. Irreliigon clear, very organized. Is this product missing categories? Would you like to tell us about a lower price? That is, there would need to be some phenomenon that is not accounted for by our physical theories, that in fact contradicts our physical theories, and that is explainable by the existence of a deity with well-defined properties.
He runs through the various arguments for the existence of God, and points out the fallacies in each. Yes, all these arguments have been used even Pascal’s wager, believe it or not – I had it used on me once.
Nevertheless here is something else someone thought I should try. Still, this is a different take on a subject that has seen dozens of new works in recent years. Which I think would be only slightly offensive to any theist reading it, though I can’t imagine any theist picking it up unless they were already beyond them self in such a way as to not get offended. Even truth does not really matter or care: Atheists, secular humanists, agnostics.
E quindi conclude citando Voltaire: Near the end of ‘Irreligion’ he gets more serious in arguing for acceptance of atheists as an increasingly necessary form of tolerance akin to that being won by ethnic, racial, gender-identity, and indeed religious minorities.
I didn’t understand the logic in it.
Elogio de la Irreligion ( edition) | Open Library
For the most part, Paulos doesn’t bother with marshaling facts and evidence against theistic arguments, but concerns himself solely with the logic or lack thereof behind them.
Okay lets try one more – just to see how systematic professor Paulos really is: For a man who thinks atheists are smart, John Allen Paulos talks to me like I’m pretty stupid. Argument From Subjectivity Chapter Special attention is paid to topics, arguments, and questions that spring from his incredulity not only about religion but also about others credulity. Once i’m done this collection I’ll never have to go to church again, no more religious studies, no more pondering theological issues that are spread throughout the globe and history, no more praying, or hope of an eternal existence with a Savior Feb 05, David rated it liked it Shelves: We all know Stalin is a better example anyway.
After all, there are no new arguments. The author’s arguments appear to be jumbled up and somewhat inconclusive, ending sometimes in jest, which further devalued his assertions.
The universe does not care. But that’s probably way over any atheists head – but fun to think about on their deathbeds.
Elogio de la Irreligion
Making it easier to read would have made it easier for the reader to understand his point of view. On the playlist are the firstcause argument, the argument from design, elkgio ontological argument, arguments from faith and biblical codes, the argument from the anthropic principle, the moral universality argument, and others.
It is short, elegant with a sometimes humorous elovio. Amazon Restaurants Food delivery from local restaurants. Sin will have a whole new meaning unless you don’t really love or care for her. Another excellent book from the author of ‘Innumeracy’ – this time he takes on about all the arguments for the existence of God, at least in any of the forms envisioned by mainstream religions.
On pagePaulos calls the belief that God is Love “equivocating” and not persuasive, but offers no explanation for this beyond making fun of the syllogism, “God is love, love is blind, my uncle is blind, therefore my elogik is God. For people who are already avowed nonbelievers, this book is an invaluable resource to aid i Written by a mathematician who went out of his way to refrain altogether from using formulas and equations and stick strictly to prose, this charming book is a humble refutation of a collection of the most common arguments in favor of the existence of god.
In any case, his subject matter eloigo interest me a great deal. Death does irrreligion care. Throughout, Paulos is contemptuous of all believers and though he can be witty most of the contempt just comes irreligipn as cruel. In each chapter, Paulos picks up a famous argument for God’s existence, then states the almost-as-famous refutation in his own words. Amazon Drive Cloud storage from Amazon.
I am quite sure Mr Paulos could make a convincing argument that I don’t exist even as I write this. Email address subscribed successfully. Sep 26, Raja99 rated it irreligon it Shelves: